Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Robert Jackson, Sr., et al v. Mychael Althouse, et al
as 19-1492
Defendant / Appellee:
MAVIS DISCOUNT TIRES, TOWNSHIP OF HATFIELD, POLICE OFFICER WILLIAM J. SUMMERFIELD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAXINE V. PRIDE, ROBERT JACKSON, SR. and ROBERT JACKSON, JR.
Jackson et al v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2018cv09688
Defendant:
Lieutenant George Gutierrez, SHERIFF Joseph Lopinto, Officer Jerome Green and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson, Jr., Lisa Jackson Noonan, Melissa Jackson and others
Undetermined:
Sergeant G Cade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JACKSON et al v. ALTHOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv03287
Defendant:
MYCHAEL ALTHOUSE, MAVIS DISCOUNT TIRES, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MAXINE V. PRIDE, ROBERT JACKSON, JR. and ROBERT JACKSON, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otis Jackson, Sr. v. Armor Correctional Health
as 14-7403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS ROBERT JACKSON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Medical, JOSE ARMAS, Dr., Medical, MEHERRIN RIVER REGIONAL JAIL and others
Jackson v. Armor Correctional Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00516
Plaintiff:
Otis Robert Jackson, Sr.
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health, Inc., Jose Armas, Meherrin River Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson, Sr. v. Jancha et al
as 6:2013cv01143
Petitioner:
Robert Jackson, Sr.
Respondent:
Rick Jancha and Bruce Hinshelwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
USA v. Robert Jackson, Sr.
as 12-10765
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT JACKSON, SR.
Covington, et al v. Garlock Sealing, et al
as 3:2003cv00236
Defendant:
Coastal Rubber & Gasket Company, Inc., General Motors Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Harris, Jerald Wayne Johnson, Charles Samuel Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
