Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Daniels et al v. Mingo County Commission et al
as 2:2023cv00820
Plaintiff:
Michelle M. Daniels and Robert Lee Daniels, Sr.
Defendant:
Mingo County Commission, Mingo County Prosecu Jonathan Jewell, Mingo County Assista Joshua Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Daniel
as 23-30154
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Lee Daniel, III
Daniels et al v. Mingo County Commission et al
as 2:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Michelle Daniels, Robert Lee Daniels, Jr., Minor C. D. and others
Defendant:
Mingo County Commission, Mingo County Sheriff Joe Smith, Lt. E. Sherrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOWDEN v. CENTRAL GEORGIA CREMATORY LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
MS stephanie bowden and STEPHANIE BOWDEN
Defendant:
CENTRAL GEORGIA CREMATORY LLC, MR ROBERT LEE DANIELS,JR. and ROBERT LEE DANIELS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BOWDEN v. CENTRAL GEORGIA CREMATORY, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00030
Defendant:
CENTRAL GEORGIA CREMATORY, LLC and ROBERT LEE DANIELS,JR.
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE BOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Daniels
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kim Tobias Thomas, Louis Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels #168369 v. Prelesnik
as 1:2013cv01141
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Daniels #168369
Respondent:
John Prelesnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sullivan et al v. Nation Safe Drivers, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Clarence Sullivan, Jr. , Clyde Smith , Deloris Cross and others
Defendant:
Nation Safe Drivers, LLC , Direct General Insurance Company of Mississippi , Direct General Insurance Agency, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
