Cases 1 - 10 of 26
SMITH, JR. et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH, JR. and THE ESTATE OF BRENDA SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Estate of DaMon R. Fisher et al v. City of Annapolis et al
as 1:2021cv01074
Plaintiff:
Darlene Faith Richardson, Estate of DaMon R. Fisher and Robert Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Raylyne Shaw, City of Annapolis, Housing Authority of the City of Annapolis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
Smith Jr. v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2021cv01159
Defendant:
John Solecki, Steven Brownfield, William Pedersen and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. USA
as 2:2017cv00284
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carl Robert Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SMITH v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00959
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Deal
as 1:2014cv00497
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Nathan Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Inslee
as 2:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Jay Inslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Warner
as 2:2013cv01396
Petitioner:
Robert Smith, Jr
Respondent:
Bernie Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. FEALY et al
as 1:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES FEALY, P. G. GRIMBERG, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
as 1:2012cv02029
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith, Jr. and Brittney E. Williams
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
