Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Johnson et al v. Bradley et al
as 4:2021cv04050
Plaintiff:
Deborah Johnson and Rodney Johnson
Defendant:
City Manager Gary Bradley, Mayor Gary Moore, Gary Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan et al v. Gautreaux et al
as 3:2021cv00048
Defendant:
John Doe #5, CorrectHealth, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Sahara Claiborne, Shaheedra Jordan and Leiaja Claiborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of South Fulton Board of Code Enforcement v. Richardson
as 1:2020cv04678
Defendant:
Rodney Johnson Richardson
Plaintiff:
City of South Fulton Board of Code Enforcement
John Johnson v. Donnie Ames
as 20-7614
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN RODNEY JOHNSON
Royalty v. Chandler et al
as 5:2020cv00401
Defendant:
Captain Mrs. Tabott, Brandi Renee Ritchie, Judge Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett Eugene Royalty, II and Garratt Eugene Royalty, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01968
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv08647
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94784
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75738
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv62255
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
