Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,391
Cervini et al v. Stapp et al
as 1:2021cv00568
Defendant: Chase Stapp, Rachel Roes, Richard Roes and others
Plaintiff: Eric Cervini, Timothy Holloway, Wendy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nathanial Hasher v. City of Rochester, et al
as 23-35576
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHANIAL JAMES HASHER
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF ROCHESTER, a Minnesota municipal entity, E. FRITZ, Officer, Badge No. 187, personally, individually, and in his capacity as a Rochester Police Officer, FAUDSKAR, Officer, personally, individually, and in his capacity as a Rochester Police and others
John and Jane Doe No.1, et al v. Bethel Local School District Board of Education, et al
as 23-3740
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN AND JANE DOE NO.1, Legal Guardians on behalf of Child No.1A, JOHN AND JANE DOE NO. 2, JOHN DOE NO. 3, Legal Guardian on behalf of Child No. 3B and Child No. 3C and others
Defendant / Appellee: BETHEL LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, LYDDA MANSFIELD, In official capacity, LORI SEBASTIAN, In official capacity and others
Intervenor / Appellee: ANNE ROE
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02704
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11935
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Doe v. Leonard et al
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Defendant: Karl S. Leonard, Ted Knight, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BT v. Smith-Green Community School Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff: B. T. and BT
Defendant: Smith-Green Community School Corporation, TERRENCE ROE, NATHAN WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16030
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Defendant: LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT, GREGORY SCHOOL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?