Cases 1 - 10 of 382
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROLLER v. EXCENTUS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
LESLIE ROLLER
Defendant:
EXCENTUS CORPORATION and VIBES MEDIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Long Island Roller Rebels v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2024cv02721
Plaintiff:
Long Island Roller Rebels
Respondent:
County of Nassau and Bruce A. Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Roller v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
David Roller
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Katherine Harris and Charlan Roller
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Tony Brummitt Insurance Agency Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CIRANNI et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
PIETRO CIRANNI, PAUL BRUMLEY, CHAD SCHOFIELD and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Entertainment Affiliates, L.L.C. v. Active8 Software LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Entertainment Affiliates, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Active8 Software LLC and Roller Networks Pty Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
