Cases 1 - 10 of 29
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35990
Plaintiff:
RONALD ARTURO BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv03648
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Lois M Baker and Ronald C Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2020cv03543
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Lois M Baker and Ronald C Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Life Time Fitness, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Life Time Fitness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
GOODWIN v. CLARK, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
WESLEY FOUST-GRAHAM GOODWIN
Defendant:
SUSAN KELLY GOODWIN CLARK, NC STATE BAR, NORMAN B. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. DesLauriers et al
as 6:2014cv01356
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Baker, David E. Benton, Sr., Richard L. Cochran and others
Defendant:
Austin DesLauriers, Sean Wagner, Tom Kinlen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
John Baker , Betty Baker , Mackie Baker and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronald Baker v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 14-3840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD JAMES BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRADFORD COUNTY
Baker v. Walsh et al
as 3:2013cv00652
Petitioner:
Ronald James Baker
Respondent:
Jerome Walsh and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alan Pitts v. United States Housing
as 13-1271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN PITTS and SENECA NICHOLSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, ATLANTA HOME OWNERSHIP CENTER, JENNIFER HARRY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
