Cases 31 - 40 of 90
United States of America v. Miller et al
as 1:2018cv02374
Defendant:
Ronald E. Miller and Deborah C. Miller
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Adkins et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jesse M. Heaton, Teresa M. Weldon, Kara N. Lanham and others
Petitioner:
Theresa M. Donnelly
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
WRIGHT et al v. SCHULTZ
as 2:2018cv00938
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY E. WRIGHT and PATRICIA L. WRIGHT
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PATRICK SCHULTZ
Defendant:
R-MILR CONSTRUCTION, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
ANDERSEN WINDOWS, INC., RONALD M. MILLER and ANDERSEN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller et al v. Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
as 1:2018cv01640
Plaintiff:
Janice Miller and Ronald Frank Miller
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Trans Union, LLC
as 3:2018cv03280
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Miller
Defendant:
Trans Union L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Ronald Miller
as 18-10532
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD LEE MILLER
Crawford v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 2:2018cv02003
Petitioner:
Tommie Perris Crawford
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Ronald L. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
McDaniel vs. Miller Et Al
as 7:2017cv00250
Defendant:
Sir Mark Allen, BP America Production Co., BP America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Lane McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 A - Civil Action to Protect Against Retaliation in Fraud Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00081
Movant:
Ronald Wayne Miller, Sr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
