Cases 1 - 10 of 18
King v. Academy of America et al
as 3:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Diamond King
Defendant:
Academy of America, Academy of Dallas, Lecester l Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Ronny Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Young
as 1:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Herman Ronnie Young, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Green v. Reynolds, et al
as 15-6158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKKE LEON GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN REYNOLDS, ROBERT PATTON, Director, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Green v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Rickke L Green
Defendant:
Dan Reynolds, Robert Patton, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Oklahoma, State of et al
as 6:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
James C. Payne
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of , Oklahoma Department of Corrections , Pittsburg County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Chapman et al
as 3:2014cv00666
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Young
Defendant:
Richie Chapman and Whaley Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ronnie Young v. St. Alexius Hospital, et al
as 12-1990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronnie Young
Defendant - Appellee:
St. Alexius Hospital, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Barra Barnes, Doctor, ER Barnes-Jewish Hospital and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
