Cases 31 - 40 of 294
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fisher et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
John T. Fisher, III, Annie S. Fisher, Sara D. Murray and others
Defendant:
Abner Smith, Jonathan Kasper, Dana Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
In re: Ronnie Rosser
as 22-11033
Petitioner:
In re: RONNIE ROSSER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Simmons v. Colonel D. Winters et al
as 2:2022cv14081
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simmons
Defendant:
Colonel D. Winters, Mrs. L. Harris, Mr. J. Holtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Colonel D. Winters et al
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simmons
Defendant:
Colonel D. Winters, Mrs. L. Harris, Mr. J. Holtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bevis v. Castillo et al
as 2:2021cv01857
Plaintiff:
Rachel Christine Bevis
Defendant:
Eduardo Duarte Castillo, EDC Transport LLC, Luis C. Chagas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parra v. Rosser et al
as 2:2021cv01812
Plaintiff:
Michael Parra
Defendant:
James Rosser, Unknown Rosser, CRST Expedited Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alexander Bayonne Stross v. Robert Washner
as 8:2021cv01575
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bayonne Stross
Defendant:
Robert Washner doing business as Universal Spa Service doing business as orangecountypoolspas.com, Blue Wave Productions LLC, Eric Randall Cripe individually doing business as Irvine Pool & Spa Repair and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
