Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Clark et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Cloe Clark and Edward Clark
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Roto-Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bridgette Neal v. Duke Energy
as 12-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGETTE NEAL, a/k/a Bridgette T. Neal
Defendant - Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY, PIKE ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC WORKS and others
Alterna Mortgage Income Fund, LLC v. GS Holdings-Brookside, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv00252
Plaintiff:
Alterna Mortgage Income Fund, LLC
Defendant:
GS Holdings-Brookside, Ltd., Forest Lake Campground and R.V. Center, LLC, Anthony M Sansalone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal v. ORS et al
as 6:2012cv01995
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Neal
Defendant:
Duke Energy, Pike Electric, SC Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills et al v. Roto-Rooter Services Company
as 0:2011cv03601
Plaintiff:
Dawn Mills , LuAnn Cosgrove and Michael Cosgrove
Defendant:
Roto-Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Res-Care, Inc. v. Roto-Rooter Services Company, et al
as 11-17132
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RES-CARE, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY and ROTO-ROOTER CORPORATION
Defendant:
BRADFORD-WHITE CORPORATION, LEONARD VALVE COMPANY and DOES, 1through 20, inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
