Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Thompson v. McLane FoodService, Inc.
as 1:2025cv12280
Plaintiff:
Ryan Thompson
Defendant:
McLane FoodService, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
THOMPSON et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2024cv01672
Plaintiff:
OLIVER DAVID THOMPSON and EDWARD P. THOMPSON
Defendant:
LEROY THOMPSON, JR. and RYAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Whirl Wind Steel Buildings, INC. v. TR Industrial LLC et al
as 4:2024cv04013
Defendant:
TR Industrial LLC, Ryan Thompson and Christopher Ryan Thompson, Sr
Plaintiff:
Whirl Wind Steel Buildings, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00570
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. Ally Financial, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Ryan Thompson
Defendant:
Ally Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. Delmas Conley Trucking of Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
William Nicholas Thompson, Jordan Ryan Thompson and Amanda Thompson
Defendant:
Delmas Conley Trucking of Ohio and Chad Larew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv06265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
