Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Boykins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv02403
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Matthew S Boykins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Boykin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv01925
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Trent S Boykin
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SLOAN v. HENDERSON et al
as 1:2016cv01144
Plaintiff:
HAROLD SLOAN
Defendant:
HENDERSON, WOODS and S. BOYKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. City of Columbus, Mississippi
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Canyon S. Boykin
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boykin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14660
Plaintiff:
Betty S. Boykin and Bobby Boykin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boykin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-14660
Plaintiff:
Betty S. Boykin and Bobby Boykin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01275
Defendant:
Acevado, Joseph L. Adams, Robert Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01280
Defendant:
A Self Storage, A and M Super Storage, Sami S Abbasi and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01278
Defendant:
Acevado, Robert Adams, Y. Adiboye and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01277
Defendant:
Acevedo, Robert Adams, Y. Adiboye and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
