Cases 1 - 10 of 483
C. et al v. HATBORO-HORSHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2024cv02605
Plaintiff:
R. C., C. K. and S. C.
Defendant:
HATBORO-HORSHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pantaleo v. S. C. Johnson & Son
as 24-1246
Plaintiff:
VALERIE C. HARRIS PANTALEO
Defendant:
S. C. JOHNSON & SON, INC.
DAVIS v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS and CHRISTOPHER HORTEN
Defendant:
R QUINN, C HORTEN, K EMMIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Wind Tower Trade Coalition
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd.
C. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03281
Plaintiff:
S. C.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Aquino, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1996
Petitioner:
DAVID CANAHUI AQUINO, MAYRA ISABEL ACETUN IXCOPAL, L. S. C. A. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MAPP, LLC. v. S & C MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
as 1:2024cv01453
Petitioner:
MAPP, LLC
Respondent:
S & C MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CLANCY et al
as 1:2024cv06203
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MICHELLE CLANCY, THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH W. CLANCY, RYAN J. CLANCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Correa E Silva, et al v. Garland
as 24-1471
Petitioner:
RICARDO CORREA E SILVA, AMANDA FORTES DA SILVA CORREA, A. F. D. S. C. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
