Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Clayton v. Capra
as 6:2022cv06416
Petitioner:
THOMAS S CLAYTON and Thomas S. Clayton
Defendant:
Michael Capra
Respondent:
Michael S. Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myles v. Hong et al
as 3:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Myles, Jr.
Defendant:
Chaplain Y. Hong, D. Husk, C.O. D. Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
YEARBY v. CLAYTON et al
as 5:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
TORIC LAVERN YEARBY
Defendant:
S CLAYTON, B ROTTER and N PIPPIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Clayton et al
as 2:2019cv02557
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines Corporation and Gregory S Clayton
Plaintiff:
Lamarcus D Hampton
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clayton v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 4:2017cv00882
Plaintiff:
Natalie S. Clayton
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clayton v. Unknown
as 3:2015cv00124
Petitioner:
Preston S. Clayton, Sr.
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REESE et al v. POOK & POOK, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv05715
Plaintiff:
CARTER P. REESE and SARAH REESE
Defendant:
POOK & POOK, LLC, RON POOK, DEBRA POOK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Clayton et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27909
Plaintiff:
Madge S. Clayton and Mark Clayton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tech USA, LLC v. Clayton et al
as 1:2013cv00792
Plaintiff:
Tech USA, LLC
Defendant:
Jennifer S. Clayton and Strategic Staffing Solutions, L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Blakely v. McCall et al
as 5:2012cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Gatewood Blakely
Defendant:
Michael McCall, D Bush, S Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
