Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Flores v. Romero et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Angie Flores
Defendant:
Danilo E. Diaz Romero and S&G Installation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/ Motor Vehicle
S.G. v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 0:2021cv00376
Defendant:
Kierra McCrorey, South Carolina Department of Social Services, Shanita Jefferson and others
Plaintiff:
S G
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01026
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WowWee Group Limited et al v. S&N Enterprises, Inc. of Virginia et al
as 3:2018cv00665
Defendant:
S&N Enterprises, Inc. of Virginia and S&G Distributors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
WowWee Group Limited, WowWee USA, Inc. and WowWee Canada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
S. G. H. v. Snider
as 4:2018cv00042
Defendant:
Pamela Snider
Plaintiff:
S. G. H.
Respondent:
Alfa Specialty Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S.G. et al v. Forest Research Institute, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv09311
Plaintiff:
S. G. and Alexis Griffith
Defendant:
Forest Research Institute, Inc. , Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abdullah v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 2:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
S. G. Abdullah
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Justin Cote-Stokes v. S.G. Satterthwaite
as 14-7885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN COTE-STOKES
Defendant - Appellee:
S. G. SATTERTHWAITE, Norfolk Deputy
S. G., a minor v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00521
Plaintiff:
Judith Gee for S. G., a minor
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cote-Stokes v. Satterthwaite
as 1:2014cv01039
Plaintiff:
Justin Cote-Stokes
Defendant:
S. G. Satterthwaite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
