Cases 1 - 10 of 14
David Webb v. Michael Kline
as 22-1262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL KLINE, Mayor, HILARY A. CROTHERS-MOORE, Commissioner, CORPORAL DENNIS R. WOOD, Police Officer and others
Webb v. Kline et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
David Q. Webb
Defendant:
Michael Kline, Hilary A. Crothers-Moore, Corporal Dennis R. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
KROLL v. HIGGINS et al
as 3:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. KROLL
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. HIGGINS, JR., ANTHONY ZANONI, MICHAEL O. TWIGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Philemon v. Hickey et al
as 1:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Raymours Furniture Company, Inc. and Paul S. Hickey
Plaintiff:
Christian Philemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00413
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
SMITH et al v. MB MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv11297
Defendant:
MARK NEARY, ESQ., JAMES M. MANSER, KATHRYN SHABEL, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN Z. SMITH and BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boudreaux Group Inc, The v. Clark Nexsen Owen Barbieri Gibson PC et al
as 8:2018cv01498
Plaintiff:
Boudreaux Group Inc, The
Defendant:
Clark Nexsen Owen Barbieri Gibson PC , Matthew S Hickey and John Doe 1-5
Counter_claimant:
Clark Nexsen Owen Barbieri Gibson PC and Matthew S Hickey
Counter_defendant:
Boudreaux Group Inc, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hickey v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv03524
Plaintiff:
Amy S. Hickey
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hickey v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv02337
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Hickey
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Warren v. Hickey et al
as 1:2015cv01042
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Warren
Defendant:
S Hickey and S Danewood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
