Cases 21 - 30 of 327
(HC) Finocchio v. Moore
as 2:2022cv01604
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Finocchio
Respondent:
S. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. CHAVIS
as 1:2022cv01783
Plaintiff:
BRIAN S. MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN M.T. CHAVIS, MELISSICA FLIPPEN, ALEYNE WOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Finocchio v. Moore
as 3:2022cv05101
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Finocchio
Respondent:
S. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fonseca v. Moore
as 3:2022cv04812
Petitioner:
Juan C Fonseca
Respondent:
S. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angel De Lara v. The People of The State of California et al
as 5:2022cv01484
Petitioner:
Angel De Lara
Respondent:
The People of The State of California and S. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12270
Plaintiff:
PETER SYLVESTER MOORE and PETER S MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Taevontae Moore
as 22-3640
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TAEVONTAE S. MOORE
Walker v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2022cv00637
Plaintiff:
Valerie A Walker
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas State Police, Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Moore v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal
as 22-1123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronnie S. Moore
Defendant / Appellee:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 1095 and Erie Community College
Moore v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Katherine S. Moore
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
