Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Nelson v. Holmes et al
as 1:2023cv05642
Plaintiff:
Brent Sebastian Nelson a man doing business as Brent Sebastian Nelson doing business as Brent S. Nelson Living Trust
Defendant:
Bryan Holmes doing business as City of Clarkston Police Department and Rodney & Pamela Sieg doing business as S&W Towing Service, Inc doing business as S&W Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Williams v. Nelson
as 1:2023cv05286
Petitioner:
Ronnie Williams
Respondent:
Dennis S. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Cohen
as 1:2023cv05062
Plaintiff:
Brent S. Nelson
Defendant:
Jordan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Stofferahn et al
as 0:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
Austin Jeffrey Jones
Defendant:
Anthony C Stofferahn, Robert J Conway, Margaret Astrup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tholson v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Leon Tholson
Defendant:
B.A. Jones, S. Nelson and State of Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Talia S. Nelson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Zell v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv01455
Plaintiff:
James Zell
Defendant:
Amica Mutual Insurance Company, Emily S. Nelson and Emily S Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nelson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv23975
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Nelson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Dade Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
