Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hong Tang v. Kurt Schmoke
as 22-1889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HONG TANG
Defendant / Appellee:
KURT L. SCHMOKE, in his official and individual capacities, DARLENE BRANNIGAN SMITH, in her official capacity, JOSEPH S. WOOD, in his official and individual capacities and others
(PS) Wood v. Redding Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Wood
Defendant:
Redding Police Department, Shasta County District Attorney Office, Shascom Communications and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tang v. Schmoke et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Hong Tang
Defendant:
Kurt L. Schmoke, Darlene Brannigan Smith, Joseph S. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Duvall et al v. Arizona Department of Child Safety et al
as 2:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Fernando Araizo, Phoenix Children's Hospital Incorporated, Chantel Madson and others
Plaintiff:
Honor Duvall and Donald Sankey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv50288
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02965
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Lohnes v. Brennan et al
as 2:2019cv00314
Defendant:
S Folson, Postmaster General Megan J Brennan and S Woods
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
(PS) Clemons v. McGlynn et al
as 2:2018cv02463
Defendant:
Tonya Moore, Kristina Crisosto, Jeri M. Hamlin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Clemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
