Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Davis-Murray v. State of California, et al
as 3:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
Blake Davis-Murray
Defendant:
State of California, Hercules Police Department, Pinole Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
SHM SHV, LLC
as 7:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
SHM SHV, LLC
Defendant:
S/V KELLY ALLEN and Robert S Griffith II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Randy Hoge, Jr. v. S. Griffith
as 20-35705
Defendant / Appellee:
S. GRIFFITH, A#249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY L. HOGE, Jr.
Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05606
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael S Griffith
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
American Modern Home Insurance Company v. Stephen et al
as 1:2019cv00843
Plaintiff:
American Modern Home Insurance Company and Charles S. Griffith, III
Defendant:
Melanie Colley, Donald Paul Gerry and William Paul Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Culverhouse v. The City of Fort Pierce et al
as 2:2018cv14227
Plaintiff:
John B. Culverhouse, Sr.
Defendant:
The City of Fort Pierce, Nicholas Mimms, Shaun Coss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith, Jr. v. BP PLC et al
as 2:2016cv04778
Defendant:
BP PLC, BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Plaintiff:
James S. Griffith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Griffith
as 5:2014cv04128
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lisa S. Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
