Cases 41 - 50 of 86
United States of America v. Hughes et al
as 3:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William F. Hughes, Jr., Sherri S. Hughes, John Mitchell Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hughes v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2011cv00310
Plaintiff:
Sharon S Hughes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv09024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HUGHES v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2011cv01425
Petitioner:
MARK S. HUGHES
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roosevelt Scott v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROOSEVELT SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, EDDIE L. PEARSON, Warden, D. NEWCOMER, Captain C/O and others
Elmer Barley v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELMER BARLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, EDDIE L. PEARSON, Warden, D. NEWCOMER, Captain C/O and others
THOMAS v. DILLIN et al
as 2:2011cv00165
Defendant:
PAUL ARKINS, STEVEN DEBROTA and S. HUGH DILLIN
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John E. Thomas v. Cale Bradford, et al
as 11-2222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALE BRADFORD, Judge, ROBERT J. HILL, S. HUGH DILLIN, Judge and others
THOMAS v. BRADFORD et al
as 2:2011cv00119
Defendant:
JUDGE CALE BRADFORD, JUDGE S. HUGH DILLIN, MR. ROBERT J. HILL and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ZOELLER et al
as 1:2011cv00351
Stricken As A Co-respondent Per Order Of 3/22/11:
ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ZOELLER
Respondent:
DEPUTY SUPT. CRAIG A. HANKS SR.
Petitioner:
MARK S. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
