Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Sullivan v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv13167
Plaintiff:
Alice S. Sullivan
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SULLIVAN v. RETTER et al
as 1:2023cv00905
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, RANDY RETTER, WYSONG and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID S SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Retter et al
as 3:2023cv00434
Defendant:
John Doe, Randy Retter, Wysong and others
Plaintiff:
David S Sullivan
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Maxwell v. Almanza
as 21-11239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Maxwell
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Almanza, Jr., Major of Correctional Officers-French Robertson Unit, Carmen Walker, LVN-Hendrick Medical Center, John #1 Doe, Correctional Officer-French Robertson Unit and others
Sullivan v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00704
Plaintiff:
Daryus S. Sullivan and Daryus D. Sullivan
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Sgt. Schroeder, Heath Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURTON v. SULLIVAN
as 1:2021cv13632
Plaintiff:
KAHLIK BURTON
Defendant:
MATTHEW S SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Sullivan v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 9:2021cv80828
Plaintiff:
Kimn S. Sullivan and Kimberly S. Sullivan
Defendant:
Safeguard Properties Management LLC and Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gibbs et al v. Carney et al
as 1:2020cv01301
Plaintiff:
Joseph Parker, Justin Erskine, William Brocklehurst and others
Defendant:
John Carney, Department of Correction, Commissioner Claire DeMatteis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
