Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Travis v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Travis
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. United Bridge Capital, LP
as 21-1790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy G. Martin
Defendant / Appellee:
United Bridge Capital, LP, United Bridge Capital Funding 3, LLC, CFAI Special Assets, LLC and others
S. Shrewsbury v. David Williams
as 20-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WANETA G. MCKINNEY and S. TRAVIS SHREWSBURY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID F. WILLIAMS
Martin v. United Bridge Capital, LP et al
as 3:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Sarper C Beyazyurek, S. Travis Masters, Justin Ehrlich and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy G. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Shrewsbury et al v. Williams
as 7:2018cv00467
Defendant:
David F Williams
Plaintiff:
S Travis Shrewsbury and Waneta G McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doss v. Beshear et al
as 3:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Angel Pastor Doss
Defendant:
Jack Conway , S. Travis Mayo , Jacob C. Wilbourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
Robert Sullivan, Jr. , Thomas P. Sullivan , Jesse Sweeney and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Pace et al v. Maximum Staffing, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02832
Plaintiff:
John H. Pace , David Fuselier and Robert S Travis
Defendant:
Maximum Staffing, LLC, Thu Le and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Hayes v. Fackler et al
as 3:2007cv00353
Plaintiff:
Terry G. Hayes
Defendant:
Danny Fackler, Darlene Brosick, Lisa York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
