Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Harper v. O'Neill et al
as 5:2026cv07886
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
R. O'Neill, Hitken, A. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Rias et al
as 6:2026cv06106
Plaintiff:
Leticia Collins
Defendant:
Cristian Rias, Wes Smith, Ralph Charles Ohm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Rias et al
as 4:2026cv00767
Plaintiff:
Leticia Collins
Defendant:
Cristian Rias, Wes Smith, Ralph Charles Ohm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WOOD v. BISIGNANO
as 4:2026cv00197
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM WOOD
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lewis v. Smith et al
as 3:2026cv01329
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lewis
Defendant:
Dr. Jon Bret Smith, Sabrina Barkley, Denton Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Woods v. House of Cheatham LLC et al
as 1:2026cv08965
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham LLC, House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roshonda S. Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woods v. White
as 1:2026cv02222
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Babari Woods
Respondent:
Phillip White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOOD v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv05269
Plaintiff:
CINDY KAY WOOD
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allababidi v. Advocate Health, Inc., et al.
as 1:2026cv00908
Plaintiff:
Ehab Allababidi
Defendant:
Advocate Health, Inc., Eugene A. Woods, Advocate Aurora Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
