Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Young v. Affranti
as 6:2024cv06172
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Young
Defendant:
Affranti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLemore v. Peterson et al
as 5:2023cv03220
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. McLemore
Defendant:
Jacob E. Peterson and Rene S. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLS v. E. JUDDUE et al
as 2:2023cv03157
Plaintiff:
RONELL NICHOLS
Defendant:
E. JUDDUE, O. DWOMOH, S. DAVIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKE EL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR (A.R.C.), A. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blake v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
E. S. Young, R. Covey, W. Shomp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
Officer White, H. Coovey, E. Prock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillespie v. James et al
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Robert David Gillespie, Sr.
Defendant:
Miss Crystie James, Miss Saint, Lt. S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 22-6785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DYE, R. BISHOP, S. YOUNG and others
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Dye, R. Bishop, S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meehan v. Young et al
as 2:2022cv02105
Plaintiff:
Shaun Michael Meehan
Defendant:
S. Young, Multiple Unknown Named SCSO Swat Officers and Multiple Unknown Named ATF Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
