Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GERICH v. PARKER et al
as 3:2022cv24818
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER GERICH
Defendant:
SAM PARKER and OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Chesterfield County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2018cv02494
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Crawford, Jr
Defendant:
Sam Parker, Chesterfield County Sheriff Department and Chris Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Crawford v. Chesterfield County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Crawford, Jr
Defendant:
Sam Parker, Chesterfield County Sheriff Department and Chris Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONIER v. CASSADY et al
as 3:2014cv00606
Plaintiff:
PHILIP M MONIER
Defendant:
JEREMY CASSADY, SAM PARKER and MELONY PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boschele et al v. Rainwater et al
as 4:2013cv01419
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boschele and Nancy Boschele
Defendant:
David G Rainwater , Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office , Sam Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sellers v. Parker et al
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
Aven Lamar Shariff Sellers
Defendant:
Sam Parker, Administrator Richie, Chesterfiled SC Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER et al v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61277
Plaintiff:
SAM PARKER and TERA PARKER
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shevchynski v. Lane County Council of Governments et al
as 6:2010cv06252
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Cornerstone Services, Inc., Tim Epperson and others
Plaintiff:
Nick Shevchynski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Little v. Parker et al
as 4:2010cv01506
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Little
Defendant:
Sam Parker, Chris Paige, Michael Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
