Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Scholl v. TIKTOK INC. et al
as 2:2026cv05267
Plaintiff:
Ardelia Scholl
Defendant:
TIKTOK INC., META PLATFORMS, INC., FACEBOOK HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scholl v. Williams et al
as 3:2026cv01086
Plaintiff:
Jevon Scholl
Defendant:
Mr. Williams and Mr. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sichanthavong v. Scholl
as 2:2026cv00125
Plaintiff:
Vicker Sichanthavong
Defendant:
Johnny Scholl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK et al v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO et al
as 1:2026cv01931
Plaintiff:
APRIL LASHELLE CLARK, KENNETH HILL, ANTHONY HILL and others
Defendant:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO, ZACH KLEIN, NATHAN ANISTINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00710
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv04058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
DRS Acquisition LLC v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv00300
Defendant:
United States, Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and United States Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff:
DRS Acquisition LLC doing business as Scholl's Wellness Company LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
