Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. University of Detroit Mercy et al
as 2:2024cv11106
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
University of Detroit Mercy and University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hines v. Foot Locker
as 24-576
Plaintiff:
SHERELL ANN HINES
Defendant:
FOOT LOCKER, INC., SHOE SENCES, MONROE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Myers v. UCSF Medical Center et al
as 3:2022cv07813
Plaintiff:
Robert Myers
Defendant:
UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco General Hospital, SFPD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN v. UNC ADAMS SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY et al
as 1:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
UNC ADAMS SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY, DAVID T. KRAWCHECK, GURMUKH S. DHALIWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Leonard Carter v. University of Washington School of Dentistry
as 22-35861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY
Carter v. University of Washington School of Dentistry
as 2:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Leonard Carter
Defendant:
University of Washington School of Dentistry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
