Cases 11 - 20 of 24,267
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01884
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Denny et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Bass Webb
Defendant:
Jason Denny, Sergeant Prinkey, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Harris et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Solomon Roberts
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Emily Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruck v. Ada County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Scott C Bruck
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff's Office, Greater Idaho Fugitive Task Force, Ada County Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Keith v. Summers et al
as 4:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean Keith
Defendant:
Summers, Smith, DeCastro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. WIZA
as 5:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
JAMES MARCEL EDWARDS
Respondent:
SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sellers v. Macdill et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant:
Justin Macdill, Carol Bradford, Chris Carr and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
