Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Parsons et al v. Funchion et al
as 3:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
Louise Czar and Scott Parsons
Defendant:
Matthew J. Funchion, Nicholas Caez, John T. Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Czar et al v. Duffy et al
as 3:2021cv00331
Defendant:
Peter Russo and Valerie L. Duffy
Plaintiff:
Louise Czar and Scott Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parsons v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00439
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Parsons
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parsons v. Mt. Baker Vapor, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv08506
Defendant:
Mt. Baker Vapor, Szenzen Fest Technology Co., LTD a/k/a Efest Power, a/k/a Efest, Shenzen Fest Technology Co., LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
WARREN et al v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2016cv01089
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN and JASON SWIDERSKI
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, JOHN A. BROWN, MARGARET FERRARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Parsons et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
Becki Parsons and Scott Parsons
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parsons et al v. Baylor Health Care System et al
as 3:2012cv04071
Plaintiff:
Michelle Burnside Parsons and Jeffrey Scott Parsons
Defendant:
Baylor Health Care System , United Surgical Partners International , American Medical Systems Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
USA v. Matthew Parson
as 11-35582
Petitioner - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant:
MATTHEW SCOTT PARSONS, AKA Scot Parsons
United States of America v. Parsons
as 3:2011mc05003
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Matthew Scott Parsons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
