Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gonzales v. Watkins & Shepard Trucking
as 26-8025
Plaintiff:
CARLOS GONZALES
Defendant:
WATKINS & SHEPARD TRUCKING, INC.
OLIVER v. CITY OF POOLER et al
as 5:2026cv00224
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant:
CITY OF POOLER, LOGANS ROADHOUSE II LLC, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 26-11820
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY DOZIER, Former Commissioner, TIMOTHY WARD, Former Commissioner and others
SHEPARD v. PILGRIM et al
as 2:2026cv01663
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SHEPARD
Defendant:
CAROLYN PILGRIM and PCS RETIREMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SHEPARD v. PILGRIM et al
as 2:2026cv01652
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SHEPARD
Defendant:
CAROLYN PILGRIM and PCS RETIREMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wafford v. Love et al
as 3:2026cv00348
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Christopher Wafford
Defendant:
David Love, Iverson Gandy, Jr., Vernon Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shepard et al v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2026cv05097
Plaintiff:
Jarmier Shepard and Darrin Dorsey
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Foodliner, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Panes v. Shea et al
as 2:2026cv02940
Plaintiff:
Michael Panes
Defendant:
Jacqueline E. Shea, Peter Kies, Simon X. Benito and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
