Cases 1 - 10 of 100
MARTIN v. SHEPARD et al
as 1:2026cv01318
Defendant:
OFFICER N. FENANDES, OFFICER YATES and AUTHOR SHEPARD
Plaintiff:
BRANDON OTHA MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepard v. Morrison
as 4:2026cv14195
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Petitioner:
Terrence Shepard
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
(PC) Shepard v. Davis, et al
as 1:2026cv08963
Defendant:
Warden, E. DeLaCruz, M. Felix and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Shepard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepard v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv12696
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC, Google LLC, TikTok, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb Shepard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Van Hawk v. Dukes et al
as 3:2026cv01563
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Kosciusko County, Kosciusko County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee Van Hawk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shepard v. USA
as 3:2026cv03810
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Deanton Shepard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(PC) Glenn v. Stanislaus County Detention Center et al
as 2:2026cv03660
Defendant:
Majusiak, Stetson, Santoyd and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Fosdick Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Manjarez et al
as 3:2026cv06051
Defendant:
Freddy Gomez, G. Jimenez, A. Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Marques T. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Martin v. Author Shepard
as 26-7133
Plaintiff:
BRANDON OTHA MARTIN
Defendant:
AUTHOR SHEPARD, Detective sued individually and in official capacity, YATES, Police Officer sued individually and in official capacity and DURHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Shepard et al v. Owners Insurance Company
as 1:2026cv05397
Plaintiff:
Jon Shepard and Haley Shepard
Defendant:
Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
