Cases 1 - 10 of 23
CHAMBERS v. SHU STAFF AT UNITED STATES PENITENTARY
as 1:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
MARCUS DONTRIEL CHAMBERS
Respondent:
SHU STAFF AT UNITED STATES PENITENTARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Mayns v. Shu Staff
as 3:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Guy Mayns
Defendant:
Shu Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Straker v. Stancil, et al
as 23-1311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDERSON STRAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STANCIL, Warden, ROOT, Captain, MOORE, Lieutentant and others
Washington v. Streeval et al
as 7:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Daryl Vincent Xzavier Washington and Darryl Washington
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Ledford, Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jeriton Curry v. J. Olberding
as 22-6497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
J. OLBERDING, SIS Officer and OFFICER HARDISON, SHU Staff
Jeriton Curry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 21-7313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. OLBERDING, SIS Officer, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WILLIAMSBURG and others
Washington v. Hayden et al
as 1:2019cv00273
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Hayden, Correctional Officer Schwartz and USP Canaan Shu Staff
Plaintiff:
Clifton Jerome Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Max Butler v. S. Porter, et al
as 19-30029
Defendant / Appellee:
S. PORTER, C. ROBINSON, CHRISTOPHER GORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAX RAY BUTLER
Lee v. USP Atlanta's Warden et al
as 1:2018mi00086
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Defendant:
All of SHU Staff, All of the Staff involved in this Complaint and USP Atlanta's Warden
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Michael Gorbey v. J. Bowle
as 17-6534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. J. BOWLES, UNKNOWN NAMED SHU STAFF, LT. OFFICER AVERY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
