Cases 1 - 10 of 658
Spann v. Gov; Henry McMaster et al
as 3:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Freddy Spann
Defendant:
Gov; Henry McMaster and Mental Health Der Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spann v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Yvette Spann
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WALTERS et al v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, VASQUEZ, T. JADRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Jafarris Deon Miller
Defendant:
Lee Harris, Tgichona Baldwin, Anthony Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toon v. Spann et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Steven Glen Toon
Defendant:
Officer Michael Andrew Spann, Officer Jonathan Sholar and The City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Spann v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Spann
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hester-Spann v. Franke et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Carren Franke, Jeremy K. Nix, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester-Spann v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton, Carren Franke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elzey et al v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey, Kortney Elzey, Dustin Havens, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton and 24/7 Towing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
