Cases 51 - 60 of 639
Ruffin v. Spurlock et al
as 1:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Ruffin
Defendant:
Tony G. Spurlock, Penny, Douglas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spurlock v. Lumpkin
as 23-20062
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daphne Octavia Spurlock
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jorden Brown v. Samuel Giles, et al
as 23-3142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDEN BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL GILES, ERIC SPURLOCK, In his individual capacity, VILLAGE OF COAL GROVE, OH and others
Spurlock v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Daphne Octavia Spurlock
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Alana Payton, Cole M. Radicic, Matthew Whelihan and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Spurlock v. Versus Productions
as 1:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Buck Spurlock
Defendant:
Versus Productions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Markwardt v. Spurlock et al
as 1:2022cv02945
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MARKWARDT
Defendant:
SHERIFF TONY SPURLOCK, MORGAN STANTON, COURTNEY ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988 - Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
