Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Renfro v. Advenir Med Center, LLC et al
as 4:2026cv05119
Defendant:
Advenir Med Center, LLC, Advenir Living, Watchtower Security, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Arne Ray Renfro, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Marsh v. Warden
as 7:2026cv00466
Petitioner:
Stephon Marsh
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill et al v. Bradley et al
as 3:2026cv03168
Plaintiff:
Eric Hill, Jermaine Dickerson, Kenneth Mobley and others
Defendant:
. Bradley and FBOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Jayden Gill
as 26-4248
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAYDEN ISAIAH STEPHON GILL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Nahadi et al v. British American Tobacco p.l.c. et al
as 1:2026cv00274
Plaintiff:
Shiwa Nahadi, Tara Mahmoudzadeh, Lommie Blackmon and others
Defendant:
British American Tobacco p.l.c. and British-American Tobacco Marketing (Singapore) Private Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Antiterrorism Act of 1990
Miles v. Gatus et al
as 2:2026cv00150
Plaintiff:
Christian Stephon Miles
Defendant:
Detective Justine Gatus, Detective Mark Amundson, Detective Zack Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
