Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Mandujano v. Didiana et al
as 1:2023cv04416
Plaintiff:
SAFIRE MANDUJANO
Defendant:
ROBERT DIDIANA, BACCI PIZZERIA & CAF, LTD and Bacci Pizzeria & Caf, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Safir v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01310
Plaintiff:
Nadira Safir
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Paz-Safir v. 1818 Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
Sagit Paz-Safir
Defendant:
1818 Holdings LLC, 7272 Partners LLC and 909 Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mitan v. Jims Pravada, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv11731
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Mitan
Defendant:
Jims Pravada, LLC and Vladislav Safir
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Juannelious Murray, Sr. v. Safir Law P.L.C.
as 20-1910
Debtor:
In re: JUANNELIOUS BENJAMIN MURRAY, SR., Debtor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUANNELIOUS BENJAMIN MURRAY, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SAFIR LAW P.L.C.
Safir v. Wright Medical Technology Inc
as 4:2020cv01024
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc
Plaintiff:
Howard Safir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv04178
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #1 through #14, The City of New York, Bronx County and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kettles v. United States of America -- Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Dominic Cirillo, Stacey Heiler, Safire Rehabilitation of Southtowns, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah Kettles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kettles v. United States of America -- Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 6:2020cv06058
Defendant:
Dominic Cirillo, Stacey Heiler, Safire Rehabilitation of Southtowns, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah Kettles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12613
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
