Cases 21 - 30 of 1,621
Davis v. Schroeder (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Sterling R. Davis and Sterling Ramonno Davis
Defendant:
Michael Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schroeder v. USA
as 2:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Joshua Jay Schroeder
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Musafir #414739 v. Schroeder
as 2:2023cv00192
Petitioner:
Yusuf Abdur-Raheem Musafir #414739
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. Archer County Sheriff's Office
as 7:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Archer County Sheriff's Office, Jack Curd, Justin Perron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schroeder v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schroeder
Defendant:
Phillis Thomas, Sarah Moore, William Duckert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner #112621 v. Schroeder
as 2:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Pierre Turner #112621
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Archy v. Nolan et al
as 1:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Eugene Archy
Defendant:
Sean Nolan, Jillian L. Schroeder, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schroeder v. USA
as 4:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
Leeanna Michelle Schroeder
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adair v. Perillo et al
as 1:2023cv05065
Plaintiff:
Patrick Adair
Defendant:
Perillo, Mort, Audy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amerson v. Cutler et al
as 1:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
De'Vonte Jamal Amerson
Defendant:
Gary Cutler, Sandra Spriegel, Jimmy Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
