Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Duncan v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Scott Duncan
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
SCOTT DUNCAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duncan et al v. Thompson et al
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Dakota Scott Duncan, George Allen Cravens and Jabarie Malik Bledsoe
Defendant:
Cassie Thompson, Nicki Fentress, Jenny Phillips and others
Interested Party:
Marvin D. Aubrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Laxmi INc. of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00563
Defendant:
Laxmi INc. of Oregon, a domestic business corporation, d/b/a Motel 6, Timothy Scott Duncan and Laxmi Inc. of Oregon a domestic business corporation doing business as Motel 6
Plaintiff:
Sylvie Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMEGELSKI v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv06031
Plaintiff:
JASON STUART SMEGELSKI
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, CHAD FLOYD, ROSS GOODMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12735
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Rice County et al
as 0:2020cv01985
Defendant:
Sartor, J. Does 1-5, Malecha and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Allen King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. INCH et al
as 3:2020cv05702
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and J SCOTT DUNCAN
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MICHAEL ANTHONY LEE
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52767
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GROSS v. DUNCAN et al
as 3:2020cv05369
Defendant:
SCOTT DUNCAN and AMY C SHEA
Plaintiff:
AVERY GROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
