Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Federal Employee Resources, LLC et al v. McGregor
as 5:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Federal Employee Resources, LLC and Jason Scott Oliver
Defendant:
Kermit Dale McGregor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Torgerson, et al v. LCC International
as 23-3039
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD TORGERSON, ROBERT HALL, SHELLEY GORDON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Virginia corporation
Defendant:
KENNY YOUNG, BRIAN DUNN, REBECCA STAHL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
James Oliver v. United States
as 22-3273
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Scott Oliver, also known as Scottie
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Oliver v. USA
as 4:2022cv00706
Petitioner:
James Scott Oliver
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cooksey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv01979
Plaintiff:
Randy Cooksey
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and Scott Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. James Oliver
as 21-2824
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Scott Oliver, also known as Scottie
Oliver v. United Postal Service, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00614
Plaintiff:
Scott Oliver
Defendant:
United Postal Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OLIVER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv59774
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK SCOTT OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
