Cases 81 - 90 of 560
Nix v. Cedar Springs Public Schools et al
as 1:2021cv00425
Defendant:
Jeff Rivard, Scott Smith, Matt Shoffner and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Robert Nix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Chelmsford Group, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10654
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
Newbury Management Company and Chelmsford Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chelmsford Group, LLC et al v. Smith
as 1:2021cv10522
Defendant:
Scott Smith
Plaintiff:
Chelmsford Group, LLC and Newbury Management Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00771
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Taylor v. City of Sherman
as 21-40158
Defendant / Appellee:
Municipal Court Assistant Prosecutor, Janie Fletcher, Clerk, Municipal Court, Sherman, Driver's Assistant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Harmon L. Taylor
Kolle v. Kyle et al
as 2:2021cv00984
Defendant:
Deborah Priece, J. Dillon, Larry McGarvey and others
Plaintiff:
John LaMar Kolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Smith v. Shirley Harry, et al
as 21-1225
Defendant / Appellee:
RESIDENT UNIT MANAGER LANG, B. SMITH, Deputy Warden, RESIDENT UNIT MANAGER CUMMINGS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT SMITH
McCalley v. UT Southwestern Medical Center
as 21-10157
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Smith, Dr, Dr Rooma Vemupali, NueHealth and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Damaris Plaisant McCalley
Degenstein v. Hall
as 21-10098
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald Milton Smith, Money Law Firm, L.L.C., Erin Nealy Cox, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Monique Degenstein
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
