Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Great American E & S Insurance Company v. Houston Casualty Company et al
as 2:2023cv01695
Plaintiff:
Great American E & S Insurance Company
Defendant:
Houston Casualty Company, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP, Sinars Slowikowski Tomasaka LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Wood v. Haverhill Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv12377
Plaintiff:
Scott Wood
Defendant:
Haverhill Police Department, Haverhill, Town of Wenham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv03275
Petitioner:
Scott Wood
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Julia Hubbard et al v. Trammell S. Crow, Jr. et al
as 5:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Julia Hubbard and Kayla Goedinghaus
Defendant:
Trammell S Crow, Jr., Dr. Benjamin Todd Eller, Richard Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wood v. Boncher
as 0:2023cv60755
Plaintiff:
Dale Scott Wood
Defendant:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GRIMSLEY et al v. WOODS et al
as 1:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GRIMSLEY and CINDY GRIMSLEY
Defendant:
ALTON SCOTT WOODS, CENTRAL TRANSPORT LLC, CHEROKEE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wood v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv11436
Petitioner:
Dale Scott Wood
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02471
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
