Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Jones v. Ritter et al
as 5:2026cv01555
Plaintiff:
Stanley Sean Jones
Defendant:
Lt FNU Ritter, FNU Graham and Dustin Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Holman (Palmer)
as 26-289
Defendant:
TOSHNELLE FOSTER, CHRISTOPHER ASHE, LASYAH PALMER and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Horton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11816
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corp Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Horton, John Hoskins, Joel Housworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gant et al v. Price et al
as 2:2024cv00431
Defendant:
ISIAH PRICE, HESHEEM RAHMAN, DWAYNE BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN GANT
Estate:
Edward Gant, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Diondre Jones v. Correctional Officer Appenheimer
as 24-6576
Plaintiff:
DIONDRE KE-SEAN JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER APPENHEIMER
Anthony Woodridge v. Cook County Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1968
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOODRIDGE
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, G. MOORE and SEAN JONES
Fleury v. Polk County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv11417
Defendant:
Sean Jones, Michigan State Police, Polk County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Fleury, Jr.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jones v. Brewer et al
as 7:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sean Jones
Defendant:
David Brewer and Lucius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cancela et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2023cv02480
Plaintiff:
EDGARDO ACEVEDO CANCELA and CASSANDRA ESCOBAR CABAN
Defendant:
Grady Judd, SEAN JONES, Sheriff Grady Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodridge v. Cook County DOC et al
as 1:2023cv04455
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woodridge
Defendant:
Cook County DOC, G. Moore and Sean Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
