Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 4:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 3:2023cv06120
Plaintiff:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toms v. Securus Phone Service
as 2:2022cv02164
Plaintiff:
Andrew Toms
Defendant:
Securus Phone Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Securus Phone LSP et al
as 3:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Byron Davis
Defendant:
Securus Phone LSP and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodfork v. Nunn, et al
as 22-6022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES JERMAINE WOODFORK
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN, individually and in official capacity, Warden, FNU RACKLEY, individually and in official capacity, CO, MIKE ROGERS, individually and in official capacity, Chief of Security and others
Locke et al v. McMinn County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Billy W. Locke, Pam Locke and Angie Thomas
Defendant:
McMinn County Jail, Securus Phone Comp., Rye Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pembleton v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv01213
Petitioner:
Tyron Pembleton
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Liuetenant Grimes, Officer Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockridge v. Sumner County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv01364
Defendant:
Sumner County Jail, Securus Phone Services and Vend Engine
Plaintiff:
Keith Lockridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Faust et al
as 6:2018cv06087
Defendant:
Officer Merritt, Warden Faust, Securus Phone Technologies and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bryce Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Greenville County et al
as 1:2015cv03526
Plaintiff:
Rabbi Dean Alton Holcomb
Defendant:
Greenville County, Marshall Stowers, Ronald Hollister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
