Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Riley v. Taylor et al
as 5:2019cv01451
Defendant:
Staci Dennis Taylor and Onondaga County Sex Offender Office
Plaintiff:
Tony D. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Cruces v. Federal Government, et al
as 19-2673
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Kansas, Sex Offender Registration, Nancy Cassidy, P.O., Federal Government - St. Joseph and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Jacob Cruces
Matthew Cruces v. Federal Government, et al
as 19-1596
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Kansas, Sex Offender Registration, Nancy Cassidy, P.O., Federal Government - St. Joseph and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Jacob Cruces
Cruces v. Federal Government et al
as 4:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jacob Cruces
Defendant:
Federal Government - St. Joseph, Federal Government - Kansas City, State of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gilstrap v. Eagle Eye Monitoring Co et al
as 8:2018cv00644
Plaintiff:
Olin Eugene Gilstrap, Donna Paige Gilstrap and Jaycie Lesley
Defendant:
Eagle Eye Monitoring Co, Sex Offender Office Pickens Co, Greg Combie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. The Attorney General State of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01658
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Sims
Respondent:
The Attorney General State of New York and The New York State Sex Offender Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sims v. Schneiderman
as 13-4502
Petitioner - Appellant:
Nathaniel Sims
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric T. Schneiderman and Sex Offenders Office
Sims v. Schneiderman et al
as 1:2013cv07200
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Sims
Respondent:
Eric Schneiderman and Sex Offenders Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooper v. State of North Carolina, Head of the Sex Offender's Office In Orange County
as 5:2010mc00038
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Cooper
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Head of the Sex Offender's Office In Orange County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
