Cases 41 - 50 of 71
USA v. Cliffton Jone
as 18-40345
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLIFFTON EARL-SHANE JONES
Barfield v. Sweet et al
as 4:2017cv00784
Plaintiff:
Tommy Barfield
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, Shane Jones and Tiger Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Gennuso
as 2:2017cv00585
Plaintiff:
Shane Jones
Defendant:
FNU Gennuso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Collinsworth et al
as 4:2017cv00706
Plaintiff:
Clifton Earl-Shane Jones
Defendant:
Linda Collinsworth, Scott Collinsworth, Lorenzo Saaverdra Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Pope County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2017cv00373
Plaintiff:
Tony Ruiz
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, Shane Jones, James Linker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Shane Jone
as 16-17410
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHANE JONES
Jones et al v. S & F Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01317
Plaintiff:
Shane Jones , James Allen , Nicholas Hammond and others
Defendant:
S & F Holdings, Inc. , S & F Custom Services, LLC , S & F Propane, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wright v. Jones et al
as 4:2016cv00753
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Wright
Defendant:
Shane Jones and Rowdy Sweet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Black v. James Linker, et al
as 16-3894
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Edward Black
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, Captain, Pope County Detention Center and Shane Jones, Sheriff, Pope County
Defendant - Appellee:
James Linker, Lieutenant, Pope County Detention Center (originally named as Jamie Linker), Nathan Neilson, Dr., Pope County Detention Center (originally named as Nathan D. Nielson), Crystal Hull, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
