Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Terrebonne et al v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03432
Plaintiff:
Brandi Terrebonne and Brandi Terrebonne A/N/F of J.P., a minor
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and Shane Lee Sanderford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ledford v. Williams et al
as 6:2023cv06091
Plaintiff:
Shane Lee Ledford
Defendant:
Judge Chris Williams and Dep Prosecuting Atty A. Davis Jared
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaGrange v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00068
Petitioner:
Shane Lee LaGrange
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Shane Henderson
as 22-1561
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHANE LEE HENDERSON
WILLIAMS v. KIJAKAZI et al
as 3:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
SHANE LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lee v. Gober et al
as 4:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Shane Lee
Defendant:
Mark Gober, Susan Potts, Barbara Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
SHANE LEE BROWN
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sheriff Joe Lombardo, City of Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornwell v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00747
Plaintiff:
Shane Lee Cornwell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
United States v. Mack
as 21-4100
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHANE LEE MACK, JR.
Dixon v. Collier et al
as 6:2021cv00220
Defendant:
Allen S Barker, Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy C Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Lee Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
