Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Jacobs v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Shane Matthew Jacobs
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shane Tew v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority
as 22-1882
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE MATTHEW TEW
Defendant / Appellee:
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY, WELLPATH, LLC, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Tew v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority et al
as 2:2021cv00641
Plaintiff:
Shane Matthew Tew
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority, Wellpath LLC, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03235
Plaintiff:
Shane Matthew Morris
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, J. Roemmich and CoreCivic Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas #596167 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00299
Defendant:
Unknown Myiers, Annette Rose Smedley, Muskegon, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Matthew Lucas #596167
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDWIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01961
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE MATTHEW BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STIERLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37376
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE MATTHEW STIERLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RADER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv12841
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE MATTHEW RADER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Campbell et al
as 6:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Melissa Campbell, Shane Matthew Clem, Partnership Housing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Tew v. Mack
as 1:2017cv00686
Plaintiff:
Shane Matthew Tew
Defendant:
Lt. Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
