Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Powell v. Bellingham Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lenorda Powell and Jerome Lenorda Powell, II
Defendant:
Bellingham Police Department, City of Bellingham, Rite Aid Pharmacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillory et al v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Co
as 2:2021cv02193
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ann Guillory and Shannon Michael Guillory
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guillory v. Dalbour
as 6:2015cv02452
Plaintiff:
Shannon Michael Guillory
Defendant:
Todd Dalbour, Terry Duhon, Bryan Foti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guillory et al v. Dalbour et al
as 2:2015cv02452
Plaintiff:
Shannon Michael Guillory , Rivial Nutrition , Advanced Nutraceutical Research L L C and others
Defendant:
Todd Dalbour, Terry Duhon, Bryan Foti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27559
Plaintiff:
Shannon Michael
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Artiglio et al v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2014cv08120
Plaintiff:
Tina Artiglio and Cristi Tutty
Defendant:
Mohave, County of, Tom Sheahan, Jeffrey Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tutty et al v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2013cv08201
Plaintiff:
Cristi Tutty and Tina Artiglio
Defendant:
Mohave, County of, Tom Sheahan, Bruce Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silknitter v. USA
as 5:2007hc02162
Petitioner:
Shannon Michael Silknitter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Silknitter v. USA
as 3:2007cv01537
Petitioner:
Shannon Michael Silknitter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
