Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reed v. Rochester, City of et al
as 2:2026cv00311
Plaintiff:
James Rodric Reed
Defendant:
Rochester, City of, Andrew Shotts, Bryce Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sylvester Williams, Jr. v. Sheetz Convenience Store, et al
as 26-2059
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
SHEETZ CONVENIENCE STORE, SPRINGETTSBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE, BRETT R. FISHEL, Badge #43-21 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hernandez et al v. Sheetz, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv01389
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez, Mariano Hernandez, Hilaria Mejia and others
Defendant:
Sheetz, Inc. and CLI Transport, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025ct03238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Woodall v. Municipality of Monroeville, et al
as 25-2867
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL WOODALL
Defendant:
OFFICER PIERRE DEFELICE, OFFICER STEVEN MARITZ, CHRISTINE J. FERRARO, Sheetz Clerk and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
